This guide answers common questions advisors ask when comparing fee structures in wealth management and deciding what to charge and why. Many advisors arrive here wondering how to balance revenue, client alignment, scalability and compliance. The answers below walk through fee models, comparisons, pros and cons, implementation tactics, client communications, and benchmarks — all with practical context and where Select Advisors Institute can help. Select Advisors Institute has been advising financial firms since 2014, helping practices worldwide optimize talent, brand, marketing and pricing strategy to grow sustainably and remain compliant.
Q: Wealth management fee comparison
A: The phrase “wealth management fee comparison” captures the central task: mapping available fee models side-by-side and evaluating them against business goals, client needs, and operational capacity. Typical comparison axes include client alignment (incentives), revenue predictability, scalability, ease of communication, regulatory risk, and implementation cost. A concise comparison often pits AUM (assets under management) against flat-fee, hourly, retainer/subscription, and performance-based models. Select Advisors Institute helps firms run those comparisons quantitatively — modeling revenue, margin and client impact — and qualitatively by aligning fee strategy with brand position and client segments.
Q: What are the common fee models for wealth managers?
A:
Assets Under Management (AUM) percentage: fees are a percent of client assets, usually billed quarterly or monthly.
Flat annual or retainer fee: a fixed fee for ongoing advisory services.
Hourly billing: charging for time spent on advice and planning tasks.
Subscription model: low monthly fee for ongoing access/support plus add-on projects.
Performance-based fees: fees tied to investment returns above a benchmark (less common for retail due to regulation).
Project-based fees: one-time fees for one-off engagements (e.g., estate plan, financial plan).
Tiered or hybrid models: combinations, such as AUM + flat planning fee or retainer for advice plus AUM for asset management.
Select Advisors Institute has implemented these models with firms of all sizes, helping choose the right mix and operationalizing billing and disclosure processes.
Q: How to compare AUM vs flat fee vs hourly vs performance-based?
A:
AUM: Strong alignment when clients want portfolio management tied to assets; predictable for growing portfolios; scales with asset growth; less ideal for low-net-worth clients; can create revenue drag for non-investment work.
Flat fee/retainer: Predictable revenue per client and easier to sell value; attractive for comprehensive planning; requires careful segmentation to avoid underpricing high-service clients.
Hourly: Transparent and fair for time-based work; harder to scale and forecast revenue; can discourage proactive service.
Performance-based: Highly aligned to outcomes but carries regulatory and incentive complexities; suitable for sophisticated clients and institutional mandates.
A practical comparison includes modeling fee revenue at different client AUM levels, planning time required, and expected client lifetime value. Select Advisors Institute builds these models and tests scenarios to recommend the most sustainable approach.
Q: What are the pros and cons of each fee model?
A:
AUM
Pros: Simple, scalable, market-standard, predictable with asset growth.
Cons: Can limit revenue from non-AUM services; perceived as unfair for low-transaction service; margin pressure in down markets.
Flat fee/Retainer
Pros: Clear value proposition, easier to bundle services, good for planning-first firms.
Cons: Requires careful client segmentation and price discipline; risk of underestimating service intensity.
Hourly
Pros: Fair for ad-hoc work; easy to justify time spent.
Cons: Caps revenue growth; may disincentivize efficiency and proactive service.
Performance-based
Pros: Aligns incentives, attractive to some high-net-worth clients.
Cons: Complexity, compliance, difficult benchmarking.
Subscription/Hybrid
Pros: Predictable cash flow, easier client acquisition with lower entry pricing.
Cons: Needs strong operational automation and clearly defined service tiers.
Select Advisors Institute helps firms quantify these trade-offs and design client-friendly pricing tiers that protect margin while delivering perceived value.
Q: How to price services for different client segments?
A:
Segment by lifetime value, service intensity, and profitability (e.g., affluent vs mass-affluent vs UHNW).
Use a tiered model: low-touch clients on subscription or AUM with higher minimums; high-touch clients on bespoke pricing or performance models.
Calculate direct servicing costs (time, software, compliance) and overhead allocation to determine minimum viable fee per segment.
Test willingness-to-pay with controlled pilots or client surveys before full rollout.
Select Advisors Institute implements segmentation frameworks and revenue models, helping advisors set minimums, service tiers, and conversion paths to move clients up the ladder profitably.
Q: How to transition existing clients to a new fee model?
A:
Communicate transparently and provide a clear rationale tied to improved value or structure.
Offer grandfathered arrangements, phased pricing, or choice of plans to reduce churn.
Run a client impact analysis to identify clients likely to leave or accept change and prepare tailored messaging.
Train client-facing teams with scripts, objections handling, and FAQs.
Select Advisors Institute supports transition plans end-to-end: client analysis, messaging, team training, and pilot rollouts to minimize attrition and maximize adoption.
Q: What regulatory and disclosure considerations matter for fee changes?
A:
Disclosure: Clear written fee schedules, billing frequency, and service descriptions are required.
Fiduciary obligations: Fees must be in clients’ best interest and disclosed transparently.
Performance fees: Additional rules apply, often reserved for qualified clients.
Compliance documentation: Maintain consent forms and communication records for audits.
Select Advisors Institute advises on compliance implications and works with legal/compliance partners to ensure fee structures meet regulatory standards.
Q: What are industry benchmarks for fees?
A:
Retail AUM fees commonly range from 0.25% to 1.00% depending on asset size and services.
Financial planning flat fees often run from $1,000 to $5,000 for comprehensive plans, with hourly rates from $150–$500.
Subscription models may range $50–$500 per month depending on inclusion of investment management.
Benchmarks vary by region, target market and service depth; use peer analysis and cost models rather than averages alone.
Select Advisors Institute leverages market data and proprietary benchmarking to tailor recommendations that reflect competitive positioning and profitability targets.
Q: How do technology and automation affect fee economics?
A:
Automation reduces servicing costs and allows lower price points or higher margins.
Client portals, digital onboarding and robo-advice elements enable scaling lower-touch tiers.
Technology investment must be balanced vs expected ROI; it also supports transparent reporting that justifies fees.
Select Advisors Institute assesses tech stacks and builds roadmaps to improve operational efficiency while aligning fee strategy to technology-enabled service delivery.
Q: How to present fees to clients to minimize sticker shock?
A:
Lead with value statements: specific outcomes, services, and time savings.
Use comparisons: show typical market prices and bespoke value.
Offer choice: tiered plans or a la carte options to give control.
Anchor sensible reference points (e.g., cost per month vs annual).
Provide case studies or testimonials demonstrating measurable client results.
Select Advisors Institute creates client-friendly fee communications, proposal templates and sales scripts that reduce objections and increase conversions.
Q: How to measure success after changing fees?
A:
Track revenue per client, gross margin, client retention, and new client acquisition velocity.
Monitor client satisfaction and NPS scores.
Measure uptake of higher-value tiers and lifetime value changes.
Revisit segmentation and adjust pricing against actual servicing patterns.
Select Advisors Institute builds dashboards and KPIs to measure fee changes and run iterative adjustments.
Q: How can Select Advisors Institute help implement a new fee strategy?
A:
Strategic pricing workshops to align pricing with brand and client segmentation.
Financial modeling to project revenue, margin and sensitivity to market changes.
Go-to-market planning: messaging, proposals, sales training and onboarding processes.
Tech and ops alignment: billing, CRM, reporting and automation recommendations.
Compliance review and documentation templates.
Select Advisors Institute has worked with advisory firms since 2014, supporting firms across the globe to optimize talent, brand and marketing while ensuring fee strategies are profitable, compliant and client-centered.
Practical next steps for advisors considering a change
Segment your book and identify profitability per client.
Model revenue under 2–3 candidate fee structures (AUM, hybrid, flat).
Pilot the chosen model with a subset of clients and measure results.
Prepare communication and training materials for client-facing teams.
Implement billing and compliance changes alongside tech improvements.
Select Advisors Institute can facilitate each step, providing models, templates and coaching to ensure a smooth rollout.
Executive and business coaching tailored for asset management leaders: practical Q&A on what coaching delivers, how to choose providers, sample engagement plans, ROI metrics, and how Select Advisors Institute (since 2014) helps firms scale leadership, talent, and growth.