You may be asking how financial firms benchmark compensation, what methods are most reliable, and how advisory firms should design pay programs that attract and retain top talent while protecting profitability. This guide answers those questions with practical, actionable detail: it explains the common benchmarking approaches, the data and metrics used, implementation steps, common pitfalls, and sample compensation frameworks for advisory firms of different sizes. Select Advisors Institute has been helping financial firms since 2014 with compensation benchmarking, talent optimization, branding, and marketing—this guide shows where benchmarking fits into that broader capability and how firms can use it to build scalable, competitive pay programs.
Q: How do financial firms benchmark compensation?
Use market surveys and third-party compensation databases to compare roles, pay levels, and pay mixes across similar firms.
Establish peer group criteria: firm size (AUM, revenue), business model (RIA, hybrid, broker-dealer), geography, client segments, and service model.
Define Total Direct Compensation (TDC) and break it into base salary, variable pay (bonuses, profit-share), and deferred/long-term incentives (equity, carry).
Normalize data to account for AUM, revenue per advisor, productivity, and local cost-of-living differences.
Use percentile targets (e.g., 50th, 75th) to set target pay positioning relative to the competitive market.
Common data sources:
Industry survey providers (e.g., NAVA, FPA, Schwab, Cerulli, and boutique providers)
Compensation benchmarking firms and proprietary studies (e.g., Select Advisors Institute)
Public filings for large firms
Peer-group benchmarking through networking associations
Q: Financial services compensation benchmarking — what metrics matter most?
AUM per advisor and revenue per advisor: tie compensation to the firm’s business scale and productivity.
Gross margin and profitability by client segment: ensure pay aligns with net economics.
Production metrics: fee revenue generated, new assets acquired (sales credit), client retention, meeting counts, revenue growth.
Efficiency and utilization metrics: number of clients served, support staff ratio, time spent on fee-generating activities.
Client satisfaction/quality measures: NPS, retention rate, lifetime client value.
Compliance and risk metrics: adherence to policies, error/incident rates, regulatory scorecards.
Use combined metrics: A compensation plan that rewards top-line growth but also requires minimum retention or margin thresholds prevents paying for unsustainable growth.
Q: Compensation benchmarking for advisory firms — what structures are commonly used?
Salary + Bonus: Base salary for stability plus performance bonus tied to revenue, AUM growth, or KPIs.
Revenue Share / Percentage of Fees: Advisors receive a percentage of fees they generate; often tiered by production level.
Fee-Based Grid (Production Grid): Sliding scale that increases advisor payout percentage as production or tenure increases.
Salary-to-Draw with True-Up: Fixed draw against future production with reconciliation at period end.
Profit-Sharing / Equity Participation: Senior advisors/partners receive shares of firm profit or equity grants to align long-term incentives.
Carry/Deferred Comp: Retention through deferred payouts contingent on tenure or vesting schedules.
Commission/Transaction-Based: Less common in pure RIAs; used in hybrid or brokerage models.
The right structure depends on growth stage:
Early-stage firms: prefer higher upside via revenue share to conserve cash.
Scaling firms: often move toward more structured salary + bonus and introduce deferred equity to secure leadership.
Mature firms: use equity, profit-share, and formal bonus pools to align with succession and valuation objectives.
Q: How should firms choose peer groups for benchmarking?
Match on objective criteria:
AUM band (e.g., <$100M, $100M–$500M, $500M–$2B, >$2B)
Revenue per advisor or firm revenue
Business model (RIA, hybrid, bank-owned, independent)
Client type (high-net-worth, mass affluent, institutional)
Geographic market (local cost-of-living and compensation markets)
Supplement with qualitative matching:
Service model (comprehensive advice vs. transactional)
Technology and operational maturity
Specializations (tax, retirement, ERISA plans)
Use multiple peer groups for cross-validation — one close match for conservatism and one aspirational group for growth targets.
Q: What normalization and adjustments are important?
Convert to common units: express compensation as TDC and compensation as a percent of revenue or per-advisor basis.
Adjust for AUM fee schedules and client mix: firms with higher-fee clients should expect higher advisor payouts.
Geographic cost-of-living adjustments: salary expectations vary widely by metro area.
Role clarity: compare like-to-like (lead advisor vs. associate advisor vs. paraplanner vs. operations).
Time horizon and vesting: account for deferred awards that affect long-term cash flow but not immediate pay.
Q: What are practical steps to run a compensation benchmarking project?
Define objectives: retention, recruitment, profitability, or succession planning.
Select peer group and data sources: internal historical data, external surveys, bespoke benchmarking.
Map roles and responsibilities: create a clear job description for each role to match against market positions.
Normalize and calculate target percentiles: pick a competitive target (e.g., 50th for baseline, 75th for growth hires).
Design plan mechanics: base/variable split, metrics, thresholds, caps, timing, and deferral rules.
Model financial impact: run P&L scenarios to ensure affordability at target growth rates.
Communicate and implement: transparent rollout, FAQs for staff, and scheduled review cadence.
Monitor and iterate: capture results and update benchmarks annually or after major firm changes.
Select Advisors Institute can conduct this entire process: delivering role mapping, peer-group selection, custom benchmarking reports, modeling the P&L impact, and helping communicate new plans to staff—services provided since 2014 to firms globally.
Q: How do benchmarking results translate into compensation decisions?
Positioning decision: decide whether to pay at median (50th), above market (75th) to attract top talent, or below market with other perks.
Pay mix decision: choose an appropriate base-to-variable ratio based on risk tolerance and desired behaviors (e.g., more variable to drive growth).
KPI selection: select a small set of measurable KPIs linking pay to desired outcomes (AUM growth, revenue, retention).
Pay philosophy: codify whether the firm rewards tenure, merit, origination, or client stewardship.
Career ladder: define progression, pay bands, and promotion criteria to retain and motivate staff.
Select Advisors Institute helps firms translate benchmarking data into a clear pay philosophy, compensation matrixes, and promotion frameworks aligned with firm goals.
Q: What are common pitfalls and how to avoid them?
Pitfall: Comparing non-comparable roles. Remedy: Create precise role profiles and match data carefully.
Pitfall: Overpaying for unprofitable production. Remedy: Tie pay to net economics and minimum margin thresholds.
Pitfall: Excessive complexity. Remedy: Keep plans understandable; simple rules drive behavior.
Pitfall: Ignoring retention and deferral. Remedy: Use vesting or deferred comp to incentivize long-term behavior.
Pitfall: Lack of review cadence. Remedy: Re-benchmark annually and after strategic changes.
Real-world caution: A firm that pays top percentile to win rainmakers must ensure backend capacity (operations, compliance) to support growth; otherwise, profitability and client experience suffer.
Q: What sample benchmarks can advisory firms expect?
Associate advisor: Base $50k–$90k + bonus potential 10%–30% of base, depending on location and AUM.
Mid-level advisor (producer): TDC often ranges $120k–$300k; payout models commonly 30%–50% of generated revenue.
Senior advisor/partner: TDC can range widely $250k–$1M+, with equity/profit-share and deferred components.
Paraplanner/operations: Base $45k–$85k with limited variable pay, unless tied to efficiency/project milestones.
Note: These ranges are illustrative. Select Advisors Institute provides custom benchmarking studies that align numbers with firm-specific peer groups and economics to produce tailored compensation targets.
Q: How should small and midsize firms approach benchmarking differently than large firms?
Small firms (startup to ~$100M AUM): prioritize cash preservation and strong upside via revenue share. Use transparent, simple plans that reward production and client acquisition.
Midsize firms ($100M–$1B): focus on scaling infrastructure. Introduce base salaries to stabilize teams and long-term incentives to retain leadership.
Large firms (> $1B): formalize pay bands, create executive compensation committees, and use equity or LTIPs for succession and valuation alignment.
Select Advisors Institute works with firms across all these stages—designing scalable compensation frameworks that evolve as firms grow.
Q: How can benchmarking support recruitment and retention?
Recruitment: Market-aligned offers based on benchmark percentiles help close candidates faster and avoid over/under offers.
Retention: Transparency about target comp, career progression, and deferred incentives reduces turnover.
Culture fit: Compensation is one element; benchmarking supports pay that reinforces the firm’s culture (collaborative vs. entrepreneurial).
Onboarding: Clearly defined pay milestones and ramp schedules reduce confusion for new hires.
Select Advisors Institute supports recruiting strategy by providing compensation offer templates, benchmarking-backed position letters, and onboarding playbooks that improve hire outcomes.
Q: When should a firm engage a benchmarking specialist like Select Advisors Institute?
Planning a major hire or team expansion.
Redesigning compensation to scale the business.
Preparing for sale, merger, or to professionalize the firm for outside investment.
Experiencing retention problems or unexplained staff turnover.
Lacking reliable market data or internal HR capability.
Since 2014, Select Advisors Institute has run tailored compensation benchmarking and implementation projects for advisory firms globally—delivering data-driven recommendations, P&L modeling, communication support, and ongoing review frameworks.
Practical guide for wealth management firms expanding to the U.S. — regulatory steps, talent and operations, go-to-market tactics, budgets, KPIs, and how Select Advisors Institute’s customized coaching (since 2014) accelerates compliant, scalable growth.